Discussion:
LG Smart TV Connectivity Issue (Wired)
(too old to reply)
felix
2017-03-30 23:29:27 UTC
Permalink
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013

currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
felix
2017-03-30 23:41:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. direct
connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out cables, etc.,


"Islamophobia and Racism: terms used to silence criticism of Islam"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-03-31 04:32:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this problem
exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out cables,
etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
felix
2017-03-31 04:48:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the modem,
bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present. that's why I
think it's a modem issue.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
felix
2017-03-31 05:12:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present. that's
why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only getting
10mbps on wifi :( I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's
better than TPG. I never had any probs when I was on Telstra cable. this
issue has only arisen since I got NBN
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-03-31 06:37:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the modem,
bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present. that's why I
think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection' (wired)
but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on
wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.

Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.

He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.

BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in the
evening.
I never had any probs when I was on Telstra cable. this issue has only
arisen since I got NBN
Yeah, it’s the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
felix
2017-03-31 11:41:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present.
that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only
getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in
the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi and only a quarter as good on
ethernet
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I never had any probs when I was on Telstra cable. this issue has
only arisen since I got NBN
Yeah, it’s the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-03-31 18:10:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present. that's
why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only getting
10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in the
evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.

TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.

Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I never had any probs when I was on Telstra cable. this issue has only
arisen since I got NBN
Yeah, it’s the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
felix
2017-03-31 23:51:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping
out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present.
that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only
getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in
the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I never had any probs when I was on Telstra cable. this issue has
only arisen since I got NBN
Yeah, it’s the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-01 02:10:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present. that's
why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only
getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in the
evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I never had any probs when I was on Telstra cable. this issue has only
arisen since I got NBN
Yeah, it’s the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
felix
2017-04-01 04:12:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping
out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time
in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-02 02:07:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present.
that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only
getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in
the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.

And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
felix
2017-04-02 03:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time
in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
if you even know. anyway, I have signed with MR, so hopefully/possibly
their modem won't have the problem, because I never has the problem with
bigpong. or maybe it's an NBN thing
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-02 04:20:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping
out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present.
that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only
getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in
the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
I have signed with MR, so hopefully/possibly their modem won't have the
problem, because I never has the problem with bigpong. or maybe it's an
NBN thing
No its not, the NBN doesn’t do anything different in that regard.

MR does tho on the standard plan, they use CGNAT, hardly anyone
else does. Unlikely to be relevant to the problem you are seeing tho.
felix
2017-04-02 03:40:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time
in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could, fuckwit
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-02 04:23:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping
out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to the
modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still present.
that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet connection'
(wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi but I'm only
getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time in
the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.

And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
felix
2017-04-02 06:27:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed. I'll post what my
connection speed is when it's up and running. the wifi speed will
improve too I guess? they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number
into CDNO mode (whatever that means) or else I would lose it. the person
I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I strongly suspect
they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC details, because I had
to mention that they should, but there was no pause like they stopped
the recording, unless of course it was BS that they were recording at all.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-02 18:17:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router
issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping
out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak time
in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.

I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the wifi
speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.

It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.

But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.

He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.

And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.

I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I strongly
suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC details, because
I had to mention that they should, but there was no pause like they
stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that they were recording
at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.

That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
felix
2017-04-03 00:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
I'm a night owl, and I watch a lot of movies, so I do care, but
hopefully I may not get the slowdown others have
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the
hardware level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
I hate that we have to deal with these foreign call centers with their
lack of knowledge and inability to solve issues. and you cant understand
what they saying half the time because of the accents. and when you ask
them to repeat themselves they think you're stupid and don't understand
what they're telling you, when it's really just the accent
Post by Rod Speed
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
yes. however telstra has told me that the copper line still works but
only for 000
Post by Rod Speed
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
I was tempted to just get a new number but I have just finished
informing all and sundry of the one TPG gave me I didn't want to have to
do it all again
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS
that they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
so you think they did record my CC details? it's a worry because anyone
who listens to the recording has all the info they need for identity
theft (name, address, DOB, etc.,) and especially since this stuff goes
overseas these days and who knows where it ends up and could be hacked
into. even without the CC info it's still a risk of ID theft with all
the info you give them. btw, the Foxtel call centre is in Africa and
they are by far the worst for all the reasons I've mentioned here and
above about call centres
Post by Rod Speed
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
yes, I see that there is no login/account page. the website it slow
loading too. i hope that's just a case of it being overload like belong
experienced when they first started up, and not indicative of the speed
of their service :)
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
F Murtz
2017-04-03 03:08:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
I'm a night owl, and I watch a lot of movies, so I do care, but
hopefully I may not get the slowdown others have
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the
hardware level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
I hate that we have to deal with these foreign call centers with their
lack of knowledge and inability to solve issues. and you cant understand
what they saying half the time because of the accents. and when you ask
them to repeat themselves they think you're stupid and don't understand
what they're telling you, when it's really just the accent
Post by Rod Speed
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
yes. however telstra has told me that the copper line still works but
only for 000
Post by Rod Speed
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
I was tempted to just get a new number but I have just finished
informing all and sundry of the one TPG gave me I didn't want to have to
do it all again
Bet you end up having to do that, If you did not leave telstra running
until you had MR up and running you will end up with a new number like me
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS
that they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
so you think they did record my CC details? it's a worry because anyone
who listens to the recording has all the info they need for identity
theft (name, address, DOB, etc.,) and especially since this stuff goes
overseas these days and who knows where it ends up and could be hacked
into. even without the CC info it's still a risk of ID theft with all
the info you give them. btw, the Foxtel call centre is in Africa and
they are by far the worst for all the reasons I've mentioned here and
above about call centres
Post by Rod Speed
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
yes, I see that there is no login/account page. the website it slow
loading too. i hope that's just a case of it being overload like belong
experienced when they first started up, and not indicative of the speed
of their service :)
felix
2017-04-03 03:15:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by F Murtz
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
I'm a night owl, and I watch a lot of movies, so I do care, but
hopefully I may not get the slowdown others have
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the
hardware level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
I hate that we have to deal with these foreign call centers with their
lack of knowledge and inability to solve issues. and you cant understand
what they saying half the time because of the accents. and when you ask
them to repeat themselves they think you're stupid and don't understand
what they're telling you, when it's really just the accent
Post by Rod Speed
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
yes. however telstra has told me that the copper line still works but
only for 000
Post by Rod Speed
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
I was tempted to just get a new number but I have just finished
informing all and sundry of the one TPG gave me I didn't want to have to
do it all again
Bet you end up having to do that, If you did not leave telstra running
it's not a telstra number, it's the voip number that TPG supplied
Post by F Murtz
until you had MR up and running you will end up with a new number like me
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS
that they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
so you think they did record my CC details? it's a worry because anyone
who listens to the recording has all the info they need for identity
theft (name, address, DOB, etc.,) and especially since this stuff goes
overseas these days and who knows where it ends up and could be hacked
into. even without the CC info it's still a risk of ID theft with all
the info you give them. btw, the Foxtel call centre is in Africa and
they are by far the worst for all the reasons I've mentioned here and
above about call centres
Post by Rod Speed
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
yes, I see that there is no login/account page. the website it slow
loading too. i hope that's just a case of it being overload like belong
experienced when they first started up, and not indicative of the speed
of their service :)
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 03:29:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
I'm a night owl, and I watch a lot of movies, so I do care,
Depends on what you mean by a night owl. The peak time
doesn’t last much past 11pm and if you get your movies using
torrents, there is no reason why you can't download them
during the non peak times. That’s what I do for the neighbours.
Post by felix
but hopefully I may not get the slowdown others have
The problem may even go away. There have been various
claims that Optus Wholesale is making major changes in
April and that may even fix the problem. MR uses them
with some POIs and has their own presence in the more
important POIs. I forget where you are now but they are
likely to have their own presence in capital city POIs.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the wifi
speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
I hate that we have to deal with these foreign call centers with their
lack of knowledge and inability to solve issues.
I've been told today that LOLO is a system Telstra Wholesale
uses and that’s why no one in Telstra retail could use it for me.

The problem with that line is that Dodo resells Telstra and
I had a senior supervisor call Telstra Wholesale and got told
that they couldn’t use LOLO to do a CDNO for my number and
that there is no way to actually make my number active again.

I don’t believe that. The whole point of putting a number into
quarantine for 6 months is so you can get it back again for a
new phone service, most often when you have moved physically.
Post by felix
and you cant understand what they saying half the time because of the
accents.
Didn’t actually have that problem that day with Telstra retail.
They were all better than I have had with some of the local
call centers who have employed Irish immigrants etc.
Post by felix
and when you ask them to repeat themselves they think you're stupid and
don't understand what they're telling you, when it's really just the
accent
Post by Rod Speed
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
yes. however telstra has told me that the copper line still works but only
for 000
That’s only true of a line that no longer has anyone paying line rent on it.

Its not true of a line physically cutover to fttn, there is no longer any
copper pair going back to the exchange anymore, it now only goes
to the node and the cutover is done in the pillar where the pair is
jumpered to the node instead of the cable going back to the exchange.

That’s why the pillars often double in height when fttn goes in,
the is double the number of termination blocks in it after the
node has been installed, with the new set terminating the massive
great multicore cables to the node. A node can have 384 services
so there needs to be that many pairs in the cable between the
node and the pillar.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
I was tempted to just get a new number
Main downside with that approach is that MR can only give
you numbers in the state capitals and since I am in a NSW
country town, its no longer a local call for others in my town.

Not a massive problem now with so many having a phone
service with unlimited calls to landlines and mobiles, but
there are still some dinosaurs around who don’t have that
sort of phone service.
Post by felix
but I have just finished informing all and sundry of the one TPG gave me I
didn't want to have to do it all again
Most call my mobile now.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
so you think they did record my CC details?
Yeah, bet they did.
Post by felix
it's a worry because anyone who listens to the recording has all the info
they need for identity theft (name, address, DOB, etc.,)
Sure, but so does anyone who works in any call center and with
most of them it’s a foreign call center with wogs in it too.
Post by felix
and especially since this stuff goes overseas these days and who knows
where it ends up and could be hacked into.
Sure, but any service that requires a credit card
number or bank account number and bills you
automatically every month has the same risk involved.

The main alternative is to manually pay it every month,
but plenty don’t allow that anymore, at least with new
accounts and they get your card or account number
when you pay anyway unless you use PayPal to pay.
Post by felix
even without the CC info it's still a risk of ID theft with all the info
you give them. btw, the Foxtel call centre is in Africa
Where abouts, the RSA presumably ?

The Telstra retail person who organised the number
reservation in the physical exchange said he had a
time zone difference of 3 hours with me but I didn’t
ask him where he was. Wasn’t obvious from his very
faint accent.
Post by felix
and they are by far the worst for all the reasons I've mentioned here and
above about call centres
Cant say I have ever used foxtel.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page where
you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got billing
working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
yes, I see that there is no login/account page. the website it slow
loading too.
I didn’t find that when I was still on adsl2+ at 8Mb/s
Post by felix
i hope that's just a case of it being overload like belong experienced
when they first started up, and not indicative of the speed of their
service :)
I've just seen today a claim that they started
with 15 in the call center and now have 60.

Not clear to me if that individual is in any
position to know those numbers tho.

The MD is pretty open about figures like that and
does call individual customers and has called me
twice now so its quite possible they are official figures.
keithr0
2017-04-03 10:23:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
What a palarver! When I changed from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN, I just
gave them my POTS number, and there it was as soon as the connection was
switched to the NBN.
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 18:33:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
What a palarver! When I changed from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN, I just gave
them my POTS number, and there it was as soon as the connection was
switched to the NBN.
Didn’t happen when Paul Edwards did exactly the same thing,
took weeks and weeks till the number showed up in the TPG NBN
service and has now taken weeks to get it back from TPG to MR too.

TPG is absolutely notorious for that in both directions.
felix
2017-04-03 22:45:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
What a palarver! When I changed from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN, I just
gave them my POTS number, and there it was as soon as the connection
was switched to the NBN.
same here. but maybe it's due to changing from the copper network? all
phone numbers on NBN are VOIP so we are not dealing with telstra anymore
Post by Rod Speed
Didn’t happen when Paul Edwards did exactly the same thing,
took weeks and weeks till the number showed up in the TPG NBN
service and has now taken weeks to get it back from TPG to MR too.
TPG is absolutely notorious for that in both directions.
I had a (surprisingly?) good experience with TPG. it took only four days
from my initial phone call until the NBN was up and running, and that
included the NBN guys coming out and installing the box.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 23:44:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
What a palarver! When I changed from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN, I just
gave them my POTS number, and there it was as soon as the connection was
switched to the NBN.
same here. but maybe it's due to changing from the copper network?
Nope, Paul has just got it porting a FTTP service from TPG to MR.
Post by felix
all phone numbers on NBN are VOIP so we are not dealing with telstra
anymore
You are if you are porting from a Telstra NBN service.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Didn’t happen when Paul Edwards did exactly the same thing,
took weeks and weeks till the number showed up in the TPG NBN
service and has now taken weeks to get it back from TPG to MR too.
TPG is absolutely notorious for that in both directions.
I had a (surprisingly?) good experience with TPG. it took only four days
from my initial phone call until the NBN was up and running, and that
included the NBN guys coming out and installing the box.
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
felix
2017-04-03 23:56:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to
inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect
it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
What a palarver! When I changed from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN, I
just gave them my POTS number, and there it was as soon as the
connection was switched to the NBN.
same here. but maybe it's due to changing from the copper network?
Nope, Paul has just got it porting a FTTP service from TPG to MR.
Post by felix
all phone numbers on NBN are VOIP so we are not dealing with telstra
anymore
You are if you are porting from a Telstra NBN service.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Didn’t happen when Paul Edwards did exactly the same thing,
took weeks and weeks till the number showed up in the TPG NBN
service and has now taken weeks to get it back from TPG to MR too.
TPG is absolutely notorious for that in both directions.
I had a (surprisingly?) good experience with TPG. it took only four
days from my initial phone call until the NBN was up and running, and
that included the NBN guys coming out and installing the box.
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
keithr0
2017-04-04 06:51:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to
inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect
it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv
direct
to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
And when you can't even manage to comprehend something
as simple as that, that’s the completely superfluous proof of
why its completely pointless listing what you should try with
the other problem.
well I have high hopes for MR, so fingers crossed.
I don’t have any regrets and would still use them
if I knew at the time all the detail I now know.
I don’t even care about a slow down in
peak times since I've gone to bed by then.
Post by felix
I'll post what my connection speed is when it's up and running. the
wifi speed will improve too I guess?
Yes it will if you end up with better than a 25/5 result at the hardware
level.
Post by felix
they said I had to tell TPG to put my phone number into CDNO mode
(whatever that means) or else I would lose it.
Its much more complicated than that. The simplest approach
is to continue to pay TPG for the phone service until the number
has been successfully ported to MR. You'll find that hardly anyone
actually knows what CDNO means, even Telstra Wholesale.
It’s a mode set using Telstra's LOLO system but I spent most of the
day trying to find someone in Telstra who even recognised the terms,
even at local supervisor level. One local supervisor did run the line that
they had new people and that that was the problem, and its certainly
true that almost all of that level of Telstra has been offshored now.
But even that local supervisor couldn’t work out which dept in Telstra
can use LOLO and do a CDNO. She connected me to NBN Billing in
Telstra and although they did recognise the terms, couldn’t actually
use LOLO and so couldn’t do a CDNO. He initially decided that the
best approach was to give me a whole new phone line on the spare
copper pair to my house, at no cost to me and was setting up a
personal visit by an NBN tech to do that until I pointed out how
inappropriate that was. And I'm not convinced that it would have
happened either because once an area goes RFS, Ready For Service,
with FTTN, you cant have any new POTS or adsl services provisioned.
He then decided that a number reservation in the physical exchange
which is done by a person in the exchange would be just as good,
and that got done on Thursday. It remains to be seen if MR can now
to a port request that will succeed.
And the other problem with Telstra is that if it doesn’t, there is no
way to get in contact with that person in Telstra again. I find it hard
to believe that if I ask for John in NBN Billing I will be able to get him
again. He did send me an SMS when the number reservation had been
done, but you can't even reply to that SMS, it’s a general SMS number
that Telstra uses for immense numbers of outgoing SMSs.
I must have been thru at least 10 different depts in Telstra that
day with just NBN billing even recognising the terms CDNO
and LOLO and even supervisors don’t appear to be able to put
those terms into their system and see what dept can do them.
Post by felix
the person I spoke to was rather ordinary as sales ppl go, and I
strongly suspect they didn't pause the recording when I gave my CC
details, because I had to mention that they should, but there was no
pause like they stopped the recording, unless of course it was BS that
they were recording at all.
Corse they do and he just fobbed you off on that.
That’s one real downside with MR, there still isnt any status page
where you can change that stuff yourself. They have only just got
billing working this year, so that’s not very surprising.
What a palarver! When I changed from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN, I
just gave them my POTS number, and there it was as soon as the
connection was switched to the NBN.
same here. but maybe it's due to changing from the copper network?
Nope, Paul has just got it porting a FTTP service from TPG to MR.
Post by felix
all phone numbers on NBN are VOIP so we are not dealing with telstra
anymore
You are if you are porting from a Telstra NBN service.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Didn’t happen when Paul Edwards did exactly the same thing,
took weeks and weeks till the number showed up in the TPG NBN
service and has now taken weeks to get it back from TPG to MR too.
TPG is absolutely notorious for that in both directions.
I had a (surprisingly?) good experience with TPG. it took only four
days from my initial phone call until the NBN was up and running, and
that included the NBN guys coming out and installing the box.
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
I did port from Telstra POTS to TPG NBN VOIP no fuss, the old connection
died, I plugged the VDSL modem in and the phone was up and running with
the old Telstra number.
BruceS
2017-04-04 14:43:34 UTC
Permalink
<snip>
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old number
needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new number. I
effectively only have two choices of ISP here, both pushing phone
service (and TV and even home security) as well. I got tired of
porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP option, Ooma. Now I
just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best deal at
the time, and should never have to port my number or deal with the
hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails. Basic
phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay the
taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
Rod Speed
2017-04-04 19:01:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old number
needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new number.
Yeah, and the other problem is the lack of an entry in the phone book.
Post by BruceS
I effectively only have two choices of ISP here,
I don’t believe that. There are dozens that can provide a service to anyone.
Post by BruceS
both pushing phone service (and TV and even home security) as well.
Just because they push it doesn’t mean you cant just say no to that stuff.
Post by BruceS
I got tired of porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP option,
Ooma.
Mine, MyNetFone can't port my number. I was planning to do
that instead of porting it to MyRepublic but discovered that they
cant port my number. And the MNF Whirlpool offer has no fixed
monthly charge at all, so is much better value than Ooma.
Post by BruceS
Now I just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best deal
at the time, and should never have to port my number or deal with the
hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails.
But pay significantly more for that.
Post by BruceS
Basic phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay the
taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
I do use MNF for all outgoing calls to landlines. I use the
mobile for calls to mobiles and when out of the house.
BruceS
2017-04-05 14:53:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took
Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old
number needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new
number.
Yeah, and the other problem is the lack of an entry in the phone book.
True, though I don't worry about that. Anyone who needs to look me up
in the book, I probably don't want to talk to.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I effectively only have two choices of ISP here,
I don’t believe that. There are dozens that can provide a service to anyone.
There are other providers, but no really viable ones. I found a list of
15 in the area. Several require optical fiber, which hasn't reached our
neighborhood, so that's out. Others are line-of-sight wireless, at
substantially higher prices than the two big players, and the hilly
terrain makes that problematic. We're really down to the phone company
with its DSL or the cable company.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
both pushing phone service (and TV and even home security) as
well.
Just because they push it doesn’t mean you cant just say no to that stuff.
Exactly. I don't even bother to reply to their repeated attempts to get
me to "bundle" with services I don't need. I get TV over the air, don't
need their phone service since I switched to Ooma, and am not nearly
paranoid enough to want a monitored security system.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I got tired of porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP
option, Ooma.
Mine, MyNetFone can't port my number. I was planning to do that
instead of porting it to MyRepublic but discovered that they cant
port my number. And the MNF Whirlpool offer has no fixed monthly
charge at all, so is much better value than Ooma.
The basic Ooma has no fixed monthly charge. Our (U.S.) federal and
state governments charge taxes for phone service (unless you're a social
parasite, in which case they provide it free!), and phone service
providers pass those taxes along. I like the blacklists enough, and I
think there was something else included, that the $10/month is
acceptable to me.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Now I just get Internet service from whichever provider has the
best deal at the time, and should never have to port my number or
deal with the hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma
fails.
But pay significantly more for that.
I'm not sure what you mean. I pay a lot less than what I used to for
phone service through the phone or cable companies, even though their
service was essentially the same, minus the blacklists.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Basic phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay
the taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
I do use MNF for all outgoing calls to landlines. I use the mobile
for calls to mobiles and when out of the house.
I rarely use my mobile, so I have a very cheap service that works best
with infrequent use. It's a prepaid with no monthly charge, just a
charge for any day I use it plus a per-minute charge. I could switch to
get rid of the daily charge and have a higher per-minute, but my pattern
of use is typically long stretches of no use, then moderate use while on
a trip. And now I'm thinking about the cost of the mobile, about
$100/year, plus the cost of the Ooma, $120/year, and wondering just what
I could get for $220/year...
Rod Speed
2017-04-05 18:30:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old number
needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new number.
Yeah, and the other problem is the lack of an entry in the phone book.
True, though I don't worry about that. Anyone who needs to look me up in
the book, I probably don't want to talk to.
I've found the opposite. I have had a call from someone
who had everything stolen in egypt as a tourist and
needed to get me to tell them the numbers to call to
have their cards cancelled. Sure, a well prepared person
wouldn’t need to, but most arent that well prepared.

The cops called me one Saturday to say I could come and pick
up the stuff some stupid kids had been caught with. They were
caught quite literally with a wheel barrow, helping themselves
to stuff out of cars they could get into. I had been out to a pissup
the night before, had got some grog in the drive thru bottleshop
and had managed to forget to lock the passengers door again
after that, in a 73 golf which doesn’t have central locking.

Sure, doesn’t happen that often.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I effectively only have two choices of ISP here,
I don’t believe that. There are dozens that can provide a service to anyone.
I'd forgotten you arent in this country.
There are other providers, but no really viable ones.
I found a list of 15 in the area. Several require optical fiber, which
hasn't reached our neighborhood, so that's out. Others are line-of-sight
wireless, at substantially higher prices than the two big players, and
the hilly terrain makes that problematic. We're really down to the phone
company with its DSL or the cable company.
Weird how primitive your system is. Your mobile system too.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
both pushing phone service (and TV and even home security) as well.
Just because they push it doesn’t mean you cant just say no to that stuff.
Exactly. I don't even bother to reply to their repeated attempts to get
me to "bundle" with services I don't need.
Just had a mate of mine have an optarse sales arsehole
tell him that while optarse does have no contract plans,
that he knows nothing about them and wont sell him one.

Presumably his commission is much higher on the contract plans.
I get TV over the air, don't need their phone service since I switched to
Ooma, and am not nearly paranoid enough to want a monitored security
system.
I don’t actually know anyone who has one so I
don’t know how well that works in practice anyway.

I'm actually the 'monitored security system' for my next door
neighbour and it only costs him free oranges, he's a fruit grower.

And I don’t actually bother with oranges anyway.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I got tired of porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP
option, Ooma.
Mine, MyNetFone can't port my number. I was planning to do that instead
of porting it to MyRepublic but discovered that they cant port my number.
And the MNF Whirlpool offer has no fixed monthly charge at all, so is
much better value than Ooma.
The basic Ooma has no fixed monthly charge. Our (U.S.) federal and state
governments charge taxes for phone service (unless you're a social
parasite, in which case they provide it free!), and phone service
providers pass those taxes along. I like the blacklists enough, and I
think there was something else included, that the $10/month is acceptable
to me.
Yeah, your system is quite different with you paying for incoming
calls from mobiles. We don’t, so don’t need blacklists.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Now I just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best
deal at the time, and should never have to port my number or deal with
the hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails.
But pay significantly more for that.
I'm not sure what you mean.
$10 per month is a lot more than $0 per month.
I pay a lot less than what I used to for phone service through the phone
or cable companies,
I pay a little less for FTTN than I paid
for a phone service and adsl2+ service
and get that voip service for free.

Only viable for incoming calls for free tho,
but its only $10/month for unlimited calls
to landlines and $20/month for unlimited
calls to landlines and mobiles and $30/month
for unlimited calls to 40 international countrys.

Our line rent for a landline is well over $35/month now.
even though their service was essentially the same, minus the blacklists.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Basic phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay the
taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
I do use MNF for all outgoing calls to landlines. I use the mobile for
calls to mobiles and when out of the house.
I rarely use my mobile,
I use it a lot now that we coordinate the opening
times of the garage/yard sales on our mobiles.
so I have a very cheap service that works best with infrequent use.
I do too, no fixed monthly charge, short calls cost me 12c

I don’t usually spend more than $10/month for calls, texts and data.
It's a prepaid
Mine is post paid.
with no monthly charge, just a charge for any day I use it
Mine doesn’t have that.
plus a per-minute charge. I could switch to get rid of the daily charge
and have a higher per-minute, but my pattern of use is typically long
stretches of no use, then moderate use while on
a trip. And now I'm thinking about the cost of the mobile, about
$100/year, plus the cost of the Ooma, $120/year, and wondering just what I
could get for $220/year...
I don’t spend as much as that, $120 a year or so for the mobile,
nothing like that for the voip calls, wouldn’t even be $30 a year
at 10c a call, regardless of the length of the call.
BruceS
2017-04-07 00:12:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old
number needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new
number.
Yeah, and the other problem is the lack of an entry in the phone book.
True, though I don't worry about that. Anyone who needs to look me up
in the book, I probably don't want to talk to.
I've found the opposite. I have had a call from someone
who had everything stolen in egypt as a tourist and
needed to get me to tell them the numbers to call to
have their cards cancelled. Sure, a well prepared person
wouldn’t need to, but most arent that well prepared.
That's a bit unusual a situation, and I figure anyone who needs that
sort of information from me probably has my number in their phone.
Post by Rod Speed
The cops called me one Saturday to say I could come and pick
up the stuff some stupid kids had been caught with. They were
caught quite literally with a wheel barrow, helping themselves
to stuff out of cars they could get into. I had been out to a pissup
the night before, had got some grog in the drive thru bottleshop
and had managed to forget to lock the passengers door again
after that, in a 73 golf which doesn’t have central locking.
Sure, doesn’t happen that often.
Now *that* should be a very unusual situation! My car only has two
doors, and they lock/unlock at the same time, but since it's a ragtop
it's not really worth locking when left outside in public overnight. I
do it anyway when in places like airport parking, but that's mainly as
defense with the insurance if anything happens. So far, I've never had
anything stolen from a car.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I effectively only have two choices of ISP here,
I don’t believe that. There are dozens that can provide a service to anyone.
I'd forgotten you arent in this country.
I thought the accent was a dead giveaway. Not to mention the Trump hat.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
There are other providers, but no really viable ones.
I found a list of 15 in the area. Several require optical fiber,
which hasn't reached our neighborhood, so that's out. Others are
line-of-sight wireless, at substantially higher prices than the two
big players, and the hilly terrain makes that problematic. We're
really down to the phone company with its DSL or the cable company.
Weird how primitive your system is. Your mobile system too.
Sometimes it seems we're only allowed to be "advanced" in military
terms.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
both pushing phone service (and TV and even home security) as well.
Just because they push it doesn’t mean you cant just say no to that stuff.
Exactly. I don't even bother to reply to their repeated attempts to
get me to "bundle" with services I don't need.
Just had a mate of mine have an optarse sales arsehole
tell him that while optarse does have no contract plans,
that he knows nothing about them and wont sell him one.
Presumably his commission is much higher on the contract plans.
Post by BruceS
I get TV over the air, don't need their phone service since I switched
to Ooma, and am not nearly paranoid enough to want a monitored
security system.
I don’t actually know anyone who has one so I
don’t know how well that works in practice anyway.
AIUI the most valuable part of one of those systems is the yard sign.
Supposedly, those discourage burglars, send them next door. This
house, like my last one, had a central security/fire alarm system, but
I never paid for monitoring. During one false alarm at the last house,
we were discussing what happened after shutting it off when a voice
came over the speaker asking us for our secret password. My wife
looked up at it in disbelief and asked "What?!" The question was
repeated, I informed them that this location wasn't supposed to be
monitored, and we never heard from them again. I think they'd crossed
some wires when a new neighbor had a system put in.
Post by Rod Speed
I'm actually the 'monitored security system' for my next door
neighbour and it only costs him free oranges, he's a fruit grower.
And I don’t actually bother with oranges anyway.
Our dogs make a lot of noise when anything unusual happens, like the
mail arrives or the water softener kicks in. If that isn't enough to
deter a burglar, I have a revolver, a couple of rifles, and a few
hundred rounds of ammo to drive the point home. I expect never to have
to use those, but they're available if I do. Some guy recently heard
three burglars breaking into his home, cleaned the gene pool of all of
them, and the police/DA response was to shake his hand and charge the
getaway driver with three counts of felony murder.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I got tired of porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP
option, Ooma.
Mine, MyNetFone can't port my number. I was planning to do that
instead of porting it to MyRepublic but discovered that they cant
port my number. And the MNF Whirlpool offer has no fixed monthly
charge at all, so is much better value than Ooma.
The basic Ooma has no fixed monthly charge. Our (U.S.) federal and
state governments charge taxes for phone service (unless you're a
social parasite, in which case they provide it free!), and phone
service providers pass those taxes along. I like the blacklists
enough, and I think there was something else included, that the
$10/month is acceptable to me.
Yeah, your system is quite different with you paying for incoming
calls from mobiles. We don’t, so don’t need blacklists.
I don't pay per-call on the home (Ooma) line, I just don't want to be
bothered by all the scammers, telemarketers, opinion polls, etc.
Anyone on one of the blacklists gets a "number no longer in service"
message if they try to call, and my phone doesn't ring. The phone
system itself (a Panasonic cordless set) has an option to block
numbers, but it's a short list, and it still has to let them ring at
least once to get the caller id info.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Now I just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best
deal at the time, and should never have to port my number or deal
with the hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails.
But pay significantly more for that.
I'm not sure what you mean.
$10 per month is a lot more than $0 per month.
Ah, right. The $0 is only an option if I go for the Ooma basic plan.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I pay a lot less than what I used to for phone service through the
phone or cable companies,
I pay a little less for FTTN than I paid
for a phone service and adsl2+ service
and get that voip service for free.
Only viable for incoming calls for free tho,
but its only $10/month for unlimited calls
to landlines and $20/month for unlimited
calls to landlines and mobiles and $30/month
for unlimited calls to 40 international countrys.
Our line rent for a landline is well over $35/month now.
You have to pay that for the line if you're on DSL, independent of the
charge for the DSL service?
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
even though their service was essentially the same, minus the blacklists.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Basic phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay
the taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
I do use MNF for all outgoing calls to landlines. I use the mobile
for calls to mobiles and when out of the house.
I rarely use my mobile,
I use it a lot now that we coordinate the opening
times of the garage/yard sales on our mobiles.
Most people I know use mobiles a lot, and many of them have given up on
home phones. So far, that hasn't seemed the best option for us.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
so I have a very cheap service that works best with infrequent use.
I do too, no fixed monthly charge, short calls cost me 12c
I don’t usually spend more than $10/month for calls, texts and data.
Post by BruceS
It's a prepaid
Mine is post paid.
Post by BruceS
with no monthly charge, just a charge for any day I use it
Mine doesn’t have that.
Post by BruceS
plus a per-minute charge. I could switch to get rid of the daily
charge and have a higher per-minute, but my pattern of use is
typically long stretches of no use, then moderate use while on
a trip. And now I'm thinking about the cost of the mobile, about
$100/year, plus the cost of the Ooma, $120/year, and wondering just
what I could get for $220/year...
I don’t spend as much as that, $120 a year or so for the mobile,
nothing like that for the voip calls, wouldn’t even be $30 a year
at 10c a call, regardless of the length of the call.
Rod Speed
2017-04-07 04:28:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old
number needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new
number.
Yeah, and the other problem is the lack of an entry in the phone book.
True, though I don't worry about that. Anyone who needs to look me up
in the book, I probably don't want to talk to.
I've found the opposite. I have had a call from someone
who had everything stolen in egypt as a tourist and
needed to get me to tell them the numbers to call to
have their cards cancelled. Sure, a well prepared person
wouldn’t need to, but most arent that well prepared.
That's a bit unusual a situation,
Yeah, its only ever happened the once.
Post by BruceS
and I figure anyone who needs that sort of information from me probably
has my number in their phone.
He didn’t ring me, we always communicated using the net.

And the phone was stolen too.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
The cops called me one Saturday to say I could come and pick
up the stuff some stupid kids had been caught with. They were
caught quite literally with a wheel barrow, helping themselves
to stuff out of cars they could get into. I had been out to a pissup
the night before, had got some grog in the drive thru bottleshop
and had managed to forget to lock the passengers door again
after that, in a 73 golf which doesn’t have central locking.
Sure, doesn’t happen that often.
Now *that* should be a very unusual situation!
Yeah, never heard of any other kids being quite that blatant
with a wheelbarrow. That was back in the says before central
locking tho so wouldn’t be as easy to do anymore.
Post by BruceS
My car only has two doors,
I have mostly avoided those.
Post by BruceS
and they lock/unlock at the same time,
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left outside in
public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like airport parking, but
that's mainly as defense with the insurance if anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Post by BruceS
So far, I've never had anything stolen from a car.
That was the only time its ever happened to me.

People I know have had it happen rather more
than me tho, I don’t live in a state capital.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I effectively only have two choices of ISP here,
I don’t believe that. There are dozens that can provide a service to anyone.
I'd forgotten you arent in this country.
I thought the accent was a dead giveaway. Not to mention the Trump hat.
I turn off the video, some of those I usenet with
are so ugly that you need to reach for the round
filing cabinet under the desk to chuck into.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
There are other providers, but no really viable ones.
I found a list of 15 in the area. Several require optical fiber,
which hasn't reached our neighborhood, so that's out. Others are
line-of-sight wireless, at substantially higher prices than the two
big players, and the hilly terrain makes that problematic. We're
really down to the phone company with its DSL or the cable company.
Weird how primitive your system is. Your mobile system too.
Sometimes it seems we're only allowed to be "advanced" in military terms.
That’s overstating it a bit given that you lot did invent the net, consumer
credit, credit cards etc.

But accurate with being about the last place on earth
to still have lots using checks and magnetic stripe cards
and havent even bothered to get rid of 1c and 2c coins.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
both pushing phone service (and TV and even home security) as well.
Just because they push it doesn’t mean you cant just say no to that stuff.
Exactly. I don't even bother to reply to their repeated attempts to
get me to "bundle" with services I don't need.
Just had a mate of mine have an optarse sales arsehole
tell him that while optarse does have no contract plans,
that he knows nothing about them and wont sell him one.
Presumably his commission is much higher on the contract plans.
Post by BruceS
I get TV over the air, don't need their phone service since I switched
to Ooma, and am not nearly paranoid enough to want a monitored
security system.
I don’t actually know anyone who has one so I
don’t know how well that works in practice anyway.
AIUI the most valuable part of one of those systems is the yard sign.
Supposedly, those discourage burglars, send them next door. This
house, like my last one, had a central security/fire alarm system, but
I never paid for monitoring. During one false alarm at the last house,
we were discussing what happened after shutting it off when a voice
came over the speaker asking us for our secret password. My wife
looked up at it in disbelief and asked "What?!" The question was
repeated, I informed them that this location wasn't supposed to be
monitored, and we never heard from them again. I think they'd crossed
some wires when a new neighbor had a system put in.
Post by Rod Speed
I'm actually the 'monitored security system' for my next door
neighbour and it only costs him free oranges, he's a fruit grower.
And I don’t actually bother with oranges anyway.
Our dogs make a lot of noise when anything unusual happens, like the mail
arrives or the water softener kicks in.
Yeah, I never bothered with a door bell, the dog left it for dead.

Bit of a problem for the postman tho. We have our letterboxes
outside, usually quite close to the hose, not on the road like yours.

I have 13 8'x8' patio doors instead of windows in all the rooms
except the bathrooms, toilets and kitchens and one of the bedrooms
looks over the letterbox on the wing wall at that end of the house.
The postman zooms around on a small motorbike to make it easy
to zoom up to the letterbox, put his feet on the ground and put
the letters and small parcels in the letterbox.

Apparently the huge great alsatian used to hurl himself against
the glass when the postman showed up and the poor bugger
was worried that one day the dog would come straight thru
and eat him alive. Would never happen in practice because
its armoured glass that you cant even get thru with a sledge
hammer as the sales fool delighted in demonstrating when
the doors were first released onto the market in the very
early 70s.
Post by BruceS
If that isn't enough to deter a burglar,
Yeah, I never had any burglar problem while that dog was alive.

Not much of a problem with the neighbours either. One Italian
fella used to borrow garden tools for a while, but as dogs often
do, the alsatian used to hurl himself at the patio door whenever
he showed up and knocked on the door and he used to get so
close to shitting his pants that he stopped borrowing tools too.
Post by BruceS
I have a revolver, a couple of rifles, and a few hundred rounds of ammo to
drive the point home. I expect never to have to use those, but they're
available if I do.
That’s frowned on here post Port Arthur.
Post by BruceS
Some guy recently heard three burglars breaking into his home, cleaned the
gene pool of all of them, and the police/DA response was to shake his hand
and charge the getaway driver with three counts of felony murder.
Yeah, you lot can be a bit more gung ho like that than ours.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I got tired of porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP
option, Ooma.
Mine, MyNetFone can't port my number. I was planning to do that
instead of porting it to MyRepublic but discovered that they cant
port my number. And the MNF Whirlpool offer has no fixed monthly
charge at all, so is much better value than Ooma.
The basic Ooma has no fixed monthly charge. Our (U.S.) federal and
state governments charge taxes for phone service (unless you're a
social parasite, in which case they provide it free!), and phone
service providers pass those taxes along. I like the blacklists
enough, and I think there was something else included, that the
$10/month is acceptable to me.
Yeah, your system is quite different with you paying for incoming
calls from mobiles. We don’t, so don’t need blacklists.
I don't pay per-call on the home (Ooma) line,
Yeah, true, forgot about that.
Post by BruceS
I just don't want to be bothered by all the scammers, telemarketers,
opinion polls, etc.
Ours mostly use fake varying numbers apart from the pollsters.
Post by BruceS
Anyone on one of the blacklists gets a "number no longer in service"
message if they try to call, and my phone doesn't ring. The phone system
itself (a Panasonic cordless set) has an option to block numbers, but it's
a short list, and it still has to let them ring at least once to get the
caller id info.
It should suppress the first ring so it isnt audible.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Now I just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best
deal at the time, and should never have to port my number or deal
with the hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails.
But pay significantly more for that.
I'm not sure what you mean.
$10 per month is a lot more than $0 per month.
Ah, right. The $0 is only an option if I go for the Ooma basic plan.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I pay a lot less than what I used to for phone service through the
phone or cable companies,
I pay a little less for FTTN than I paid
for a phone service and adsl2+ service
and get that voip service for free.
Only viable for incoming calls for free tho,
but its only $10/month for unlimited calls
to landlines and $20/month for unlimited
calls to landlines and mobiles and $30/month
for unlimited calls to 40 international countrys.
Our line rent for a landline is well over $35/month now.
You have to pay that for the line if you're on DSL, independent of the
charge for the DSL service?
With the old monopoly telco. Since they lost their monopoly,
some of the newer players do offer what they call a naked
service, no POTS phone service and no need to pay for that.

But they have to have their own DSLAMs in the exchange or
RIM or CMUX to be able to do that and only one has their own
DSLAMs in my town and they don’t offer a naked service either.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
even though their service was essentially the same, minus the blacklists.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Basic phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay
the taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
I do use MNF for all outgoing calls to landlines. I use the mobile
for calls to mobiles and when out of the house.
I rarely use my mobile,
I use it a lot now that we coordinate the opening
times of the garage/yard sales on our mobiles.
Most people I know use mobiles a lot,
Yeah, specially the kids. I was helping a couple of kids move
house, 'kids' in their 30s, and those buggers would ring each
other when telling each other what to move to the car.
Post by BruceS
and many of them have given up on home phones.
Yeah, hardly any I know have a landline anymore.
Post by BruceS
So far, that hasn't seemed the best option for us.
I would have if I could have had a naked service but since
I had to have the landline to get the DSL service didn’t bother.
Never called out on it tho unless the net was down or with toll
free numbers. We don’t have the free local call system you lot have.

It’s a close call for me now, I could have unlimited free
national calls and texts on my mobile for $25/month
but normally only spend $10/month.

The cheapest landline service with no calls included is $35/
month which certainly explains why so many don’t have a
landline anymore.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
so I have a very cheap service that works best with infrequent use.
I do too, no fixed monthly charge, short calls cost me 12c
I don’t usually spend more than $10/month for calls, texts and data.
Post by BruceS
It's a prepaid
Mine is post paid.
Post by BruceS
with no monthly charge, just a charge for any day I use it
Mine doesn’t have that.
Post by BruceS
plus a per-minute charge. I could switch to get rid of the daily
charge and have a higher per-minute, but my pattern of use is
typically long stretches of no use, then moderate use while on
a trip. And now I'm thinking about the cost of the mobile, about
$100/year, plus the cost of the Ooma, $120/year, and wondering just
what I could get for $220/year...
I don’t spend as much as that, $120 a year or so for the mobile,
nothing like that for the voip calls, wouldn’t even be $30 a year
at 10c a call, regardless of the length of the call.
BruceS42
2017-04-07 19:38:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old
number needs to get your new one, and you need to remember the new
number.
Yeah, and the other problem is the lack of an entry in the phone book.
True, though I don't worry about that. Anyone who needs to look me up
in the book, I probably don't want to talk to.
I've found the opposite. I have had a call from someone
who had everything stolen in egypt as a tourist and
needed to get me to tell them the numbers to call to
have their cards cancelled. Sure, a well prepared person
wouldn’t need to, but most arent that well prepared.
That's a bit unusual a situation,
Yeah, its only ever happened the once.
Post by BruceS
and I figure anyone who needs that sort of information from me
probably has my number in their phone.
He didn’t ring me, we always communicated using the net.
And the phone was stolen too.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
The cops called me one Saturday to say I could come and pick
up the stuff some stupid kids had been caught with. They were
caught quite literally with a wheel barrow, helping themselves
to stuff out of cars they could get into. I had been out to a pissup
the night before, had got some grog in the drive thru bottleshop
and had managed to forget to lock the passengers door again
after that, in a 73 golf which doesn’t have central locking.
Sure, doesn’t happen that often.
Now *that* should be a very unusual situation!
Yeah, never heard of any other kids being quite that blatant
with a wheelbarrow. That was back in the says before central
locking tho so wouldn’t be as easy to do anymore.
Post by BruceS
My car only has two doors,
I have mostly avoided those.
I prefer 2-seaters, especially ragops.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
and they lock/unlock at the same time,
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Some cities here have specific laws against leaving your car unlocked
*and running*, but that's as close as I've seen it here. People like
to do that ("puffing") in winter, but car thieves see it as easy
pickings. We even had a cop car stolen that way, with all the cop
stuff in the trunk.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
So far, I've never had anything stolen from a car.
That was the only time its ever happened to me.
People I know have had it happen rather more
than me tho, I don’t live in a state capital.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I effectively only have two choices of ISP here,
I don’t believe that. There are dozens that can provide a service to anyone.
I'd forgotten you arent in this country.
I thought the accent was a dead giveaway. Not to mention the Trump hat.
I turn off the video, some of those I usenet with
are so ugly that you need to reach for the round
filing cabinet under the desk to chuck into.
I don't post any video, I was just joking. Not a lot of accent in
writing, unless you count spelling of things like "color".
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
There are other providers, but no really viable ones.
I found a list of 15 in the area. Several require optical fiber,
which hasn't reached our neighborhood, so that's out. Others are
line-of-sight wireless, at substantially higher prices than the two
big players, and the hilly terrain makes that problematic. We're
really down to the phone company with its DSL or the cable company.
Weird how primitive your system is. Your mobile system too.
Sometimes it seems we're only allowed to be "advanced" in military terms.
That’s overstating it a bit given that you lot did invent the net, consumer
credit, credit cards etc.
But accurate with being about the last place on earth
to still have lots using checks and magnetic stripe cards
and havent even bothered to get rid of 1c and 2c coins.
We don't have 2c, but it would be nice to follow Canada's lead and get
rid of the 1c. Considering the devaluation of the dollar over the
years, we could easily just go to dollars and tenths. Have coins for
$.1, $.5, $1, and maybe $5, paper for higher values. We really don't
use cash much here anyway, everything being on plastic. Some of us
don't use checks much, either. My wife writes one per month to her
hairdresser, and I sometimes use them for annual taxes. Most places
require card users to use the chip if their card has one, and most of
the cards do, now. The way our laws work, if the card has a chip but
the vendor allows the use of the less secure stripe, the vendor takes
the liability for any theft or fraud. If the card doesn't have the
chip, the card provider takes the liability. So there's some incentive.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
both pushing phone service (and TV and even home security) as well.
Just because they push it doesn’t mean you cant just say no to that stuff.
Exactly. I don't even bother to reply to their repeated attempts to
get me to "bundle" with services I don't need.
Just had a mate of mine have an optarse sales arsehole
tell him that while optarse does have no contract plans,
that he knows nothing about them and wont sell him one.
Presumably his commission is much higher on the contract plans.
Post by BruceS
I get TV over the air, don't need their phone service since I switched
to Ooma, and am not nearly paranoid enough to want a monitored
security system.
I don’t actually know anyone who has one so I
don’t know how well that works in practice anyway.
AIUI the most valuable part of one of those systems is the yard sign.
Supposedly, those discourage burglars, send them next door. This
house, like my last one, had a central security/fire alarm system, but
I never paid for monitoring. During one false alarm at the last house,
we were discussing what happened after shutting it off when a voice
came over the speaker asking us for our secret password. My wife
looked up at it in disbelief and asked "What?!" The question was
repeated, I informed them that this location wasn't supposed to be
monitored, and we never heard from them again. I think they'd crossed
some wires when a new neighbor had a system put in.
Post by Rod Speed
I'm actually the 'monitored security system' for my next door
neighbour and it only costs him free oranges, he's a fruit grower.
And I don’t actually bother with oranges anyway.
Our dogs make a lot of noise when anything unusual happens, like the
mail arrives or the water softener kicks in.
Yeah, I never bothered with a door bell, the dog left it for dead.
We have one, but it's too quiet for me unless I'm in that part of the
house. The dogs hear it from anywhere in the house and make noise.
Post by Rod Speed
Bit of a problem for the postman tho. We have our letterboxes
outside, usually quite close to the hose, not on the road like yours.
Ours is a mail slot through the wall, not an actual box. Most houses
in our neighborhood have either that, or a box on the wall by the front
door. This sort of thing is more common in cities here than in suburbs
like ours, where boxes on the road are usually standard.
Post by Rod Speed
I have 13 8'x8' patio doors instead of windows in all the rooms
except the bathrooms, toilets and kitchens and one of the bedrooms
looks over the letterbox on the wing wall at that end of the house.
The postman zooms around on a small motorbike to make it easy
to zoom up to the letterbox, put his feet on the ground and put
the letters and small parcels in the letterbox.
Our guy parks his little mail truck and walks the mail door to door for
a few blocks, then moves his truck and does another area. In bad
weather he'll stop at the end of walkway to the front door.
Post by Rod Speed
Apparently the huge great alsatian used to hurl himself against
the glass when the postman showed up and the poor bugger
was worried that one day the dog would come straight thru
and eat him alive. Would never happen in practice because
its armoured glass that you cant even get thru with a sledge
hammer as the sales fool delighted in demonstrating when
the doors were first released onto the market in the very
early 70s.
Post by BruceS
If that isn't enough to deter a burglar,
Yeah, I never had any burglar problem while that dog was alive.
Not much of a problem with the neighbours either. One Italian
fella used to borrow garden tools for a while, but as dogs often
do, the alsatian used to hurl himself at the patio door whenever
he showed up and knocked on the door and he used to get so
close to shitting his pants that he stopped borrowing tools too.
Post by BruceS
I have a revolver, a couple of rifles, and a few hundred rounds of
ammo to drive the point home. I expect never to have to use those,
but they're available if I do.
That’s frowned on here post Port Arthur.
So far, I don't even need any sort of registration or license for
them. I'd need a license to carry them concealed in public, but not
openly. Some states are moving to full permissions for concealed carry
as well. I had a concealed permit in another state. I explained to
the clerk that I only wanted to carry firearms unloaded and partly
disassembled (cylinder out of the revolver), locked in the trunk of the
car, between the house and a shooting range. She said I needed the
permit for that. I asked if it was the same one that would allow me to
carry under my jacket, fully loaded and chambered, and she said "we
only have the one."
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Some guy recently heard three burglars breaking into his home, cleaned
the gene pool of all of them, and the police/DA response was to shake
his hand and charge the getaway driver with three counts of felony
murder.
Yeah, you lot can be a bit more gung ho like that than ours.
I like that felony murder law, and would like to see more states have
it. Essentially it says that if you're involved in a felony, and
someone dies as a result of that felony, either during it or right
after, you're guilty of murder. The main intent was to stop criminals
claiming they killed someone "by accident" during a robbery, etc., but
its use has become broader.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I got tired of porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP
option, Ooma.
Mine, MyNetFone can't port my number. I was planning to do that
instead of porting it to MyRepublic but discovered that they cant
port my number. And the MNF Whirlpool offer has no fixed monthly
charge at all, so is much better value than Ooma.
The basic Ooma has no fixed monthly charge. Our (U.S.) federal and
state governments charge taxes for phone service (unless you're a
social parasite, in which case they provide it free!), and phone
service providers pass those taxes along. I like the blacklists
enough, and I think there was something else included, that the
$10/month is acceptable to me.
Yeah, your system is quite different with you paying for incoming
calls from mobiles. We don’t, so don’t need blacklists.
I don't pay per-call on the home (Ooma) line,
Yeah, true, forgot about that.
Post by BruceS
I just don't want to be bothered by all the scammers, telemarketers,
opinion polls, etc.
Ours mostly use fake varying numbers apart from the pollsters.
That part's harder to fight. If they change the Caller ID numbers
often enough, the public blacklists can't keep up. It's unfortunately
easy to spoof those.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Anyone on one of the blacklists gets a "number no longer in service"
message if they try to call, and my phone doesn't ring. The phone
system itself (a Panasonic cordless set) has an option to block
numbers, but it's a short list, and it still has to let them ring at
least once to get the caller id info.
It should suppress the first ring so it isnt audible.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Now I just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best
deal at the time, and should never have to port my number or deal
with the hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails.
But pay significantly more for that.
I'm not sure what you mean.
$10 per month is a lot more than $0 per month.
Ah, right. The $0 is only an option if I go for the Ooma basic plan.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
I pay a lot less than what I used to for phone service through the
phone or cable companies,
I pay a little less for FTTN than I paid
for a phone service and adsl2+ service
and get that voip service for free.
Only viable for incoming calls for free tho,
but its only $10/month for unlimited calls
to landlines and $20/month for unlimited
calls to landlines and mobiles and $30/month
for unlimited calls to 40 international countrys.
Our line rent for a landline is well over $35/month now.
You have to pay that for the line if you're on DSL, independent of the
charge for the DSL service?
With the old monopoly telco. Since they lost their monopoly,
some of the newer players do offer what they call a naked
service, no POTS phone service and no need to pay for that.
But they have to have their own DSLAMs in the exchange or
RIM or CMUX to be able to do that and only one has their own
DSLAMs in my town and they don’t offer a naked service either.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
even though their service was essentially the same, minus the blacklists.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Basic phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay
the taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
I do use MNF for all outgoing calls to landlines. I use the mobile
for calls to mobiles and when out of the house.
I rarely use my mobile,
I use it a lot now that we coordinate the opening
times of the garage/yard sales on our mobiles.
Most people I know use mobiles a lot,
Yeah, specially the kids. I was helping a couple of kids move
house, 'kids' in their 30s, and those buggers would ring each
other when telling each other what to move to the car.
I use my voice for things like that, but I'm a Luddite.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
and many of them have given up on home phones.
Yeah, hardly any I know have a landline anymore.
Post by BruceS
So far, that hasn't seemed the best option for us.
I would have if I could have had a naked service but since
I had to have the landline to get the DSL service didn’t bother.
Never called out on it tho unless the net was down or with toll
free numbers. We don’t have the free local call system you lot have.
It’s a close call for me now, I could have unlimited free
national calls and texts on my mobile for $25/month
but normally only spend $10/month.
The cheapest landline service with no calls included is $35/
month which certainly explains why so many don’t have a
landline anymore.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
so I have a very cheap service that works best with infrequent use.
I do too, no fixed monthly charge, short calls cost me 12c
I don’t usually spend more than $10/month for calls, texts and data.
Post by BruceS
It's a prepaid
Mine is post paid.
Post by BruceS
with no monthly charge, just a charge for any day I use it
Mine doesn’t have that.
Post by BruceS
plus a per-minute charge. I could switch to get rid of the daily
charge and have a higher per-minute, but my pattern of use is
typically long stretches of no use, then moderate use while on
a trip. And now I'm thinking about the cost of the mobile, about
$100/year, plus the cost of the Ooma, $120/year, and wondering just
what I could get for $220/year...
I don’t spend as much as that, $120 a year or so for the mobile,
nothing like that for the voip calls, wouldn’t even be $30 a year
at 10c a call, regardless of the length of the call.
keithr0
2017-04-08 04:21:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down. I dont even bother to
wind the windows up when I leave mine like that. It does have an
immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
Rod Speed
2017-04-08 18:54:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that. It
does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
BruceS
2017-04-08 21:41:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that.
It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys with
the chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and skilled,
they're going to steal your car whatever measures you take. AIUI, car
thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're easy to sell (or
sell the parts from, more likely). Mine has a standard, so anyone with
towing ability could get in, locked or not, put it in neutral, and haul
it away. I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two
spaces away instead.
Rod Speed
2017-04-08 22:44:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that.
It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys with the
chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and skilled,
they're going to steal your car whatever measures you take.
Not with modern security systems they can't. Sure, they can just
drag it onto a truck and drive off with it on the truck, but they
don’t have the truck to do that with and even that doesn’t
work quite a bit of the time. You couldn’t get my car onto
the truck where I park it at home and the dog would have
given the game away if someone was stupid enough to try it.
AIUI, car thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're easy to sell
(or sell the parts from, more likely).
And are now into full home invasion to get the keys
so they can just drive it away, and fuck you over so
you can't ring the cops and tell them its been stolen.
Mine has a standard,
So is mine.
so anyone with towing ability could get in, locked or not,
by smashing the window, sure, but that would have the
car screaming its lungs out even if the dog was out.
put it in neutral, and haul it away.
Not possible with where mine is.
I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two spaces away
instead.
Sure, they likely can't even drive a manual.
BruceS
2017-04-10 15:07:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that.
It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys with
the chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and skilled,
they're going to steal your car whatever measures you take.
Not with modern security systems they can't. Sure, they can just
drag it onto a truck and drive off with it on the truck, but they
don’t have the truck to do that with and even that doesn’t
work quite a bit of the time. You couldn’t get my car onto
That's the kind of theft I was thinking of, using a truck.
Post by Rod Speed
the truck where I park it at home and the dog would have
given the game away if someone was stupid enough to try it.
At home, I park in a garage, so there's the extra step of getting into
that. The main garage door has no windows, so they wouldn't even know
what vehicles are in there without coming through the gate into the
backyard. I was thinking more of when I park it in public.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
AIUI, car thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're easy to
sell (or sell the parts from, more likely).
And are now into full home invasion to get the keys
so they can just drive it away, and fuck you over so
you can't ring the cops and tell them its been stolen.
Here, of course, the thieves have to be more desperate to risk going
into the house to get the keys. I'm only moderately armed, but one of
my neighbors has literally dozens of firearms, and who knows how much
ammo (he makes his own), with no way of knowing from outside his
house. His son is with the sheriff's department, so cleanup from an
incident could be cleanly handled.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Mine has a standard,
So is mine.
Post by BruceS
so anyone with towing ability could get in, locked or not,
by smashing the window, sure, but that would have the
car screaming its lungs out even if the dog was out.
With mine, they could just cut the top if I had it closed. I don't
think the alarm (automatically activated when I lock the car) would be
tripped from that, or from shifting to neutral. I've never tested
that, though. If anyone attempted to get into the garage or backyard,
the dogs would sound their own alarm, but again I'm more thinking of it
being stolen from a public lot.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
put it in neutral, and haul it away.
Not possible with where mine is.
Post by BruceS
I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two spaces away
instead.
Sure, they likely can't even drive a manual.
In the States, that's quite possible. Driving lessons are in
automatics, and many never learn a manual. We haven't had an automatic
since I retired my '68, so we had to teach our daughter to drive a
manual once she had her basic permit. That was kind of fun.
Rod Speed
2017-04-10 17:24:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that.
It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys with
the chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and skilled,
they're going to steal your car whatever measures you take.
Not with modern security systems they can't. Sure, they can just
drag it onto a truck and drive off with it on the truck, but they
don’t have the truck to do that with and even that doesn’t
work quite a bit of the time. You couldn’t get my car onto
That's the kind of theft I was thinking of, using a truck.
Post by Rod Speed
the truck where I park it at home and the dog would have
given the game away if someone was stupid enough to try it.
At home, I park in a garage, so there's the extra step of getting into
that. The main garage door has no windows, so they wouldn't even know
what vehicles are in there without coming through the gate into the
backyard.
I don’t have a garage or even a carport, but the car is parked
in such a way that its impossible to drag it onto a truck. You
couldn’t physically drag it to where it could be winched onto
a truck and the steering is on full lock too, so you couldn’t
even wreck the parking break and get it out of gear and
use gorillas to move it to where the truck could get to.

And the dog would give the game away even if you
showed up with a truck anyway, let alone the apes trying
to get into the car. And its not the sort of car anyone
would want to go to that much trouble for anyway.
Post by BruceS
I was thinking more of when I park it in public.
Even that’s not as easy as it looks. In theory if the car is parked
on the side of the road, you can just show up with a truck and
drag it onto the truck with the winch, but you are sure to be
noticed doing that, blocking the traffic with the truck. And its
easy enough to have a tracking system in the car which sees
the cops show up as its being dragged onto the truck.

Not that easy in a normal carpark either.

Sure, it wouldn’t be hard to make it look like a car
repossession, but again, the car is of no interest to
anyone to go to that much trouble. I'm not stupid
enough to have a high value car that’s worth stealing.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
AIUI, car thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're easy to
sell (or sell the parts from, more likely).
And are now into full home invasion to get the keys
so they can just drive it away, and fuck you over so
you can't ring the cops and tell them its been stolen.
Here, of course, the thieves have to be more desperate to risk going into
the house to get the keys. I'm only moderately armed, but one of my
neighbors has literally dozens of firearms, and who knows how much ammo
(he makes his own), with no way of knowing from outside his house. His
son is with the sheriff's department, so cleanup from an incident could be
cleanly handled.
Sure, but the crims don’t know that and
may be stupid/drugged enough to try it.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Mine has a standard,
So is mine.
Post by BruceS
so anyone with towing ability could get in, locked or not,
by smashing the window, sure, but that would have the
car screaming its lungs out even if the dog was out.
And all us neighbours always show up when
one of the alarms starts screaming even tho
its mostly false alarms, even if its 2am etc.
Post by BruceS
With mine, they could just cut the top if I had it closed. I don't think
the alarm (automatically activated when I lock the car) would be tripped
from that, or from shifting to neutral. I've never tested that, though.
Easy enough to ensure it would be on movement of the car.
Post by BruceS
If anyone attempted to get into the garage or backyard, the dogs would
sound their own alarm, but again I'm more thinking of it being stolen from
a public lot.
Even easier to have a proper movement alarm and
automatic calling of the cops when its moved with
full tracking. Sure, in theory you can drag it into a
faraday cage truck, but that’s so rarely seen that
someone is going to notice it happening and no one
is going to bother with a car that’s only worth $2K
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
put it in neutral, and haul it away.
Not possible with where mine is.
Post by BruceS
I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two spaces away
instead.
Sure, they likely can't even drive a manual.
In the States, that's quite possible. Driving lessons are in automatics,
and many never learn a manual.
Just as true here, most of the kids can't drive manuals.

I was happy to lend mine to one of the ones I taught to
drive in his automatic, when he showed up by train here
with his 3 year old for a week or so. I had to lend mine to
a mate of mine and the kid, who is 35, used his automatic.
Post by BruceS
We haven't had an automatic since I retired my '68, so we had to teach our
daughter to drive a manual once she had her basic permit. That was kind
of fun.
BruceS
2017-04-10 20:04:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central
locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking
when left outside in public overnight. I do it anyway
when in places like airport parking, but that's mainly
as defense with the insurance if anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in
public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine
like that. It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is
going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys
with the chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and
skilled, they're going to steal your car whatever measures you
take.
Not with modern security systems they can't. Sure, they can just
drag it onto a truck and drive off with it on the truck, but
they don’t have the truck to do that with and even that doesn’t
work quite a bit of the time. You couldn’t get my car onto
That's the kind of theft I was thinking of, using a truck.
Post by Rod Speed
the truck where I park it at home and the dog would have given
the game away if someone was stupid enough to try it.
At home, I park in a garage, so there's the extra step of getting
into that. The main garage door has no windows, so they wouldn't
even know what vehicles are in there without coming through the
gate into the backyard.
I don’t have a garage or even a carport, but the car is parked in
such a way that its impossible to drag it onto a truck. You couldn’t
physically drag it to where it could be winched onto a truck and the
steering is on full lock too, so you couldn’t even wreck the parking
break and get it out of gear and use gorillas to move it to where the
truck could get to.
And the dog would give the game away even if you showed up with a
truck anyway, let alone the apes trying to get into the car. And its
not the sort of car anyone would want to go to that much trouble for
anyway.
Post by BruceS
I was thinking more of when I park it in public.
Even that’s not as easy as it looks. In theory if the car is parked
on the side of the road, you can just show up with a truck and drag
it onto the truck with the winch, but you are sure to be noticed
doing that, blocking the traffic with the truck. And its easy enough
to have a tracking system in the car which sees the cops show up as
its being dragged onto the truck.
Mine doesn't have a tracking system, but thieves might expect it to.
Not that easy in a normal carpark either.
Sure, it wouldn’t be hard to make it look like a car repossession,
but again, the car is of no interest to anyone to go to that much
trouble. I'm not stupid enough to have a high value car that’s worth
stealing.
That's true, most places I'd park in public could have video coverage,
and there always seem to be people with mobile phones taking video of
anything unusual.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
AIUI, car thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're
easy to sell (or sell the parts from, more likely).
And are now into full home invasion to get the keys so they can
just drive it away, and fuck you over so you can't ring the cops
and tell them its been stolen.
Here, of course, the thieves have to be more desperate to risk
going into the house to get the keys. I'm only moderately armed,
but one of my neighbors has literally dozens of firearms, and who
knows how much ammo (he makes his own), with no way of knowing from
outside his house. His son is with the sheriff's department, so
cleanup from an incident could be cleanly handled.
Sure, but the crims don’t know that and may be stupid/drugged enough
to try it.
Some of them do just that, and are removed from the gene pool for their
efforts. In a recent case, the family of the dead home invaders
complained about the use of lethal force, saying it wasn't "fair" since
their boy wasn't nearly as well armed.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Mine has a standard,
So is mine.
Post by BruceS
so anyone with towing ability could get in, locked or not,
by smashing the window, sure, but that would have the car
screaming its lungs out even if the dog was out.
And all us neighbours always show up when one of the alarms starts
screaming even tho its mostly false alarms, even if its 2am etc.
Post by BruceS
With mine, they could just cut the top if I had it closed. I
don't think the alarm (automatically activated when I lock the car)
would be tripped from that, or from shifting to neutral. I've
never tested that, though.
Easy enough to ensure it would be on movement of the car.
That would be simple enough to test. I could lock it in a reasonably
empty lot, then climb in, put it in neutral and try pushing it. I'm
probably not going to bother, though. I've had the car almost 9 years
and nobody's tried to steal it yet.
Post by BruceS
If anyone attempted to get into the garage or backyard, the dogs
would sound their own alarm, but again I'm more thinking of it
being stolen from a public lot.
Even easier to have a proper movement alarm and automatic calling of
the cops when its moved with full tracking. Sure, in theory you can
drag it into a faraday cage truck, but that’s so rarely seen that
someone is going to notice it happening and no one is going to bother
with a car that’s only worth $2K
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
put it in neutral, and haul it away.
Not possible with where mine is.
Post by BruceS
I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two
spaces away instead.
Sure, they likely can't even drive a manual.
In the States, that's quite possible. Driving lessons are in
automatics, and many never learn a manual.
Just as true here, most of the kids can't drive manuals.
I thought we were unusual in that.
I was happy to lend mine to one of the ones I taught to drive in his
automatic, when he showed up by train here with his 3 year old for a
week or so. I had to lend mine to a mate of mine and the kid, who is
35, used his automatic.
Post by BruceS
We haven't had an automatic since I retired my '68, so we had to
teach our daughter to drive a manual once she had her basic permit.
That was kind of fun.
Rod Speed
2017-04-10 21:54:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central
locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking
when left outside in public overnight. I do it anyway
when in places like airport parking, but that's mainly
as defense with the insurance if anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in
public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine
like that. It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is
going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys
with the chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and
skilled, they're going to steal your car whatever measures you
take.
Not with modern security systems they can't. Sure, they can just
drag it onto a truck and drive off with it on the truck, but
they don’t have the truck to do that with and even that doesn’t
work quite a bit of the time. You couldn’t get my car onto
That's the kind of theft I was thinking of, using a truck.
Post by Rod Speed
the truck where I park it at home and the dog would have given
the game away if someone was stupid enough to try it.
At home, I park in a garage, so there's the extra step of getting
into that. The main garage door has no windows, so they wouldn't
even know what vehicles are in there without coming through the
gate into the backyard.
I don’t have a garage or even a carport, but the car is parked in
such a way that its impossible to drag it onto a truck. You couldn’t
physically drag it to where it could be winched onto a truck and the
steering is on full lock too, so you couldn’t even wreck the parking
break and get it out of gear and use gorillas to move it to where the
truck could get to.
And the dog would give the game away even if you showed up with a
truck anyway, let alone the apes trying to get into the car. And its
not the sort of car anyone would want to go to that much trouble for
anyway.
Post by BruceS
I was thinking more of when I park it in public.
Even that’s not as easy as it looks. In theory if the car is parked
on the side of the road, you can just show up with a truck and drag
it onto the truck with the winch, but you are sure to be noticed
doing that, blocking the traffic with the truck. And its easy enough
to have a tracking system in the car which sees the cops show up as
its being dragged onto the truck.
Mine doesn't have a tracking system, but thieves might expect it to.
Not that easy in a normal carpark either.
Sure, it wouldn’t be hard to make it look like a car repossession,
but again, the car is of no interest to anyone to go to that much
trouble. I'm not stupid enough to have a high value car that’s worth
stealing.
That's true, most places I'd park in public could have video coverage,
and there always seem to be people with mobile phones taking video of
anything unusual.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
AIUI, car thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're
easy to sell (or sell the parts from, more likely).
And are now into full home invasion to get the keys so they can
just drive it away, and fuck you over so you can't ring the cops
and tell them its been stolen.
Here, of course, the thieves have to be more desperate to risk
going into the house to get the keys. I'm only moderately armed,
but one of my neighbors has literally dozens of firearms, and who
knows how much ammo (he makes his own), with no way of knowing from
outside his house. His son is with the sheriff's department, so
cleanup from an incident could be cleanly handled.
Sure, but the crims don’t know that and may be stupid/drugged enough
to try it.
Some of them do just that, and are removed from the gene pool for their
efforts. In a recent case, the family of the dead home invaders
complained about the use of lethal force, saying it wasn't "fair" since
their boy wasn't nearly as well armed.
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
Mine has a standard,
So is mine.
Post by BruceS
so anyone with towing ability could get in, locked or not,
by smashing the window, sure, but that would have the car
screaming its lungs out even if the dog was out.
And all us neighbours always show up when one of the alarms starts
screaming even tho its mostly false alarms, even if its 2am etc.
Post by BruceS
With mine, they could just cut the top if I had it closed. I
don't think the alarm (automatically activated when I lock the car)
would be tripped from that, or from shifting to neutral. I've
never tested that, though.
Easy enough to ensure it would be on movement of the car.
That would be simple enough to test. I could lock it in a reasonably
empty lot, then climb in, put it in neutral and try pushing it. I'm
probably not going to bother, though. I've had the car almost 9 years
and nobody's tried to steal it yet.
My next door but one neighbour had the house for 45 years, no one
had tried to break in during that time. Then someone did, with cans
of accelerant and burnt it out completely, while they were on holiday.
Post by BruceS
Post by BruceS
If anyone attempted to get into the garage or backyard, the dogs
would sound their own alarm, but again I'm more thinking of it
being stolen from a public lot.
Even easier to have a proper movement alarm and automatic calling of
the cops when its moved with full tracking. Sure, in theory you can
drag it into a faraday cage truck, but that’s so rarely seen that
someone is going to notice it happening and no one is going to bother
with a car that’s only worth $2K
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by BruceS
put it in neutral, and haul it away.
Not possible with where mine is.
Post by BruceS
I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two
spaces away instead.
Sure, they likely can't even drive a manual.
In the States, that's quite possible. Driving lessons are in
automatics, and many never learn a manual.
Just as true here, most of the kids can't drive manuals.
I thought we were unusual in that.
Nar, just first. Very common in Canada and NZ too.
Post by BruceS
I was happy to lend mine to one of the ones I taught to drive in his
automatic, when he showed up by train here with his 3 year old for a
week or so. I had to lend mine to a mate of mine and the kid, who is
35, used his automatic.
Post by BruceS
We haven't had an automatic since I retired my '68, so we had to
teach our daughter to drive a manual once she had her basic permit.
That was kind of fun.
keithr0
2017-04-09 03:15:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that.
It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
Even if I don't lock my car, it takes one of those special keys with
the chip in it to start it. If someone's dedicated and skilled,
they're going to steal your car whatever measures you take. AIUI, car
thieves focus more on very common cars, as they're easy to sell (or
sell the parts from, more likely). Mine has a standard, so anyone with
towing ability could get in, locked or not, put it in neutral, and haul
it away. I'm counting on them going for the Honda Accord parked two
spaces away instead.
Mine has nothing like that being a 1991 model, but it does have an
immobiliser locked with a double row key that also locks the bonnet
(hood) down.
keithr0
2017-04-09 03:19:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Yeah, but that was back in the days before central locking.
Post by BruceS
but since it's a ragtop it's not really worth locking when left
outside in public overnight. I do it anyway when in places like
airport parking, but that's mainly as defense with the insurance if
anything happens.
Its actually illegal here to leave the car unlocked in public.
Kind of futile with a rag top with the top down.
Nope, stops the car getting stolen with a decent modern one.
On a modern car just turning the ignition off will usually prevent
anybody without specialised equipment driving away with it. My Mazda 3
even locks the doors automatically when I walk away from it. My 1991 MX5
is quite a different proposition though, hence the immobiliser and the
lack of need to lock it.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
I dont even bother to wind the windows up when I leave mine like that.
It does have an immobiliser though, nobody is going to steal it.
felix
2017-04-05 09:27:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by BruceS
<snip>
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
How long did it take to get the phone number ported ? Took Paul weeks.
I didn't port. TPG gave me a new number
To me, that would be a major hassle. Everyone who has your old number
needs to get your new one,
most ppl, business, etc', also have my mobile number, and friends/family
always ring the mobile
Post by BruceS
and you need to remember the new number.
now that IS a problem.. :)
Post by BruceS
I
effectively only have two choices of ISP here, both pushing phone
service (and TV and even home security) as well. I got tired of
porting the phone, and went to an independent VOIP option, Ooma. Now I
just get Internet service from whichever provider has the best deal at
the time, and should never have to port my number or deal with the
hassle of telling everyone my new number, unless Ooma fails. Basic
phone service with them is free, just buy the device and pay the
taxes. Of course they push other services, and I use their
$10USD/month phone service, with blacklists and other features.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
keithr0
2017-04-02 10:22:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. Locking up at random
intervals is (about once a week requiring a power cycle) and the DHCP
server is complete rubbish, everything in our house is set on static
addresses.
felix
2017-04-02 10:49:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem. Locking up at
random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power cycle) and
the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
is that the TPG server? so changing from TPG might remedy the connection
issue I'm having? I have eight items accessing the net via the TPG modem.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-02 17:41:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Blue Heeler
2017-04-02 22:56:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
It's actually about the only option with the useless Huewai FTTN modem
that TPG foists on it's unsuspecting customers. The DHCP implementation
is severely broken and if you use it for more than a very small number
of devices you end up with constant IP conflicts, and the modem's
response to thos eis to lock up. I have ordered a TP-Link modem and
when that arrives I will hassle the setup data out of TPG (who
cunningly lock down their piece of shit modem so that the only
paramaters the user can changes are userID, IP address and password.
felix
2017-04-02 23:44:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Blue Heeler
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
It's actually about the only option with the useless Huewai FTTN modem
that TPG foists on it's unsuspecting customers.
my TPG modem is a Netcomm NF12
Post by Blue Heeler
The DHCP implementation
is severely broken and if you use it for more than a very small number
of devices you end up with constant IP conflicts, and the modem's
response to thos eis to lock up. I have ordered a TP-Link modem and
when that arrives I will hassle the setup data out of TPG (who
cunningly lock down their piece of shit modem so that the only
paramaters the user can changes are userID, IP address and password.
not with the NF12. I can change lots of 'stuff'
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 00:09:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Blue Heeler
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
It's actually about the only option with the useless Huewai
FTTN modem that TPG foists on it's unsuspecting customers.
Sure, but it makes a lot more sense to
replace that steaming turd of a modem.

That way you don’t have to do a full reboot every week and can
do the full 100/40 that the NBN service can do over wifi too.

And if you have enough of a clue to change to MR, you get a much
better modem for $1, and a much cheaper 100/40 unlimited service too.
Post by Blue Heeler
The DHCP implementation is severely broken and if you use it for
more than a very small number of devices you end up with constant
IP conflicts, and the modem's response to thos eis to lock up.
I have ordered a TP-Link modem
A vastly better approach.
Post by Blue Heeler
and when that arrives I will hassle > the setup data out of TPG
(who cunningly lock down their piece of shit modem so that the only
paramaters the user can changes are userID, IP address and password.
Makes more sense to change to MyRepublic instead and costs nothing.
Blue Heeler
2017-04-03 03:18:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Makes more sense to change to MyRepublic instead and costs nothing.
Thanks for that. I am in the process of establishing that I am not
getting what I am paying for from TPG so that I can accept their breach
of contract and terminate. i shall look seriously at MyRepublic as
their replacement.
felix
2017-04-02 23:35:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test
gives 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a
power cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
I thought that was the solution to the (my) problem. ie. the modem can't
handle the switching between the various items connected (to put it into
laymans terms)
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 00:11:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
I thought that was the solution to the (my) problem. ie. the modem can't
handle the switching between the various items connected (to put it into
laymans terms)
Yes, that was one of the things worth trying suggested in
that thread you couldn’t manage to read and comprehend.

But IMO it makes a lot more sense to change to MR instead
and fix that and quite a few other downsides with TPG as well.
felix
2017-04-03 00:23:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test
gives 21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a
power cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
I thought that was the solution to the (my) problem. ie. the modem
can't handle the switching between the various items connected (to
put it into laymans terms)
Yes, that was one of the things worth trying suggested in
that thread you couldn’t manage to read and comprehend.
well, it wasn't so much that, but I just couldn't be bothered studying
it and learning anything I needed to. I just 'switched off'. I can
access my streaming services via my Fetch box, the internet via a PC and
an android box, all connected to the TV/AV setup, so I don't need to use
the smart TV features.
Post by Rod Speed
But IMO it makes a lot more sense to change to MR instead
and fix that and quite a few other downsides with TPG as well.
but you rubbished the idea that it was a modem/ISP problem when I
suggested it
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 03:31:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
I thought that was the solution to the (my) problem. ie. the modem can't
handle the switching between the various items connected (to put it into
laymans terms)
Yes, that was one of the things worth trying suggested in
that thread you couldn’t manage to read and comprehend.
well, it wasn't so much that, but I just couldn't be bothered studying it
and learning anything I needed to. I just 'switched off'. I can access my
streaming services via my Fetch box, the internet via a PC and an android
box, all connected to the TV/AV setup, so I don't need to use the smart TV
features.
Post by Rod Speed
But IMO it makes a lot more sense to change to MR instead
and fix that and quite a few other downsides with TPG as well.
but you rubbished the idea that it was a modem/ISP problem when I
suggested it
You never said anything about an ISP problem and
I never rubbish the idea that it could be the modem.
keithr0
2017-04-03 10:10:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to
assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing
for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out
and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making
leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a
completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is
trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 18:28:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad,
Corse it is.
Post by keithr0
the DHCP server is completely broken.
The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given
that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem.
Post by keithr0
It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet
going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease
running out and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed
by making leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline
it got a completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is trivial
to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd
like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like
the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates.
felix
2017-04-03 22:37:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad,
Corse it is.
Post by keithr0
the DHCP server is completely broken.
The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given
that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem.
Post by keithr0
It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the
internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced
to the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was
required. That was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but
then if something went offline it got a completely different IP
address when it cam back on very annoying particularly with things
like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I have monitoring
things like solar power output and solar hot water temperature. The
solution, give everything a static address it is trivial to do and
takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd
like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like
the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates.
I've never had to reset mine, and I checked the wifi speed last night.
it was 22 mbps, so that's very good considering I'm on the 25mbps plan.
the modem is Netcomm NF12. maybe TPG also use other other brands? I'm
wondering now if I've done the right thing changing to MR especially
since I've signed up for 12 months :(
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-03 23:42:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad,
Corse it is.
Post by keithr0
the DHCP server is completely broken.
The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given
that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem.
Post by keithr0
It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the
internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to
the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was required. That
was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but then if something
went offline it got a completely different IP address when it cam back
on very annoying particularly with things like printers and a bunch of
IOT sensors that I have monitoring things like solar power output and
solar hot water temperature. The solution, give everything a static
address it is trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the
picture.
But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd
like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like
the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates.
I've never had to reset mine,
They have in fact supplied a number of quite different modems,
the netcomm NF7, NF12, the Haewai etc.
Post by felix
and I checked the wifi speed last night. it was 22 mbps, so that's very
good considering I'm on the 25mbps plan.
But useless on the 100/40 plan.
Post by felix
the modem is Netcomm NF12. maybe TPG also use other other brands?
They do indeed and other models of that brand too.
Post by felix
I'm wondering now if I've done the right thing changing to MR especially
since I've signed up for 12 months :(
You've got a 100/40 service for less than you were paying for
25/5, get a much better modem than that steaming turd, for $1,
get MUCH better support than anything TPG supplies etc etc etc.
felix
2017-04-03 23:55:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to
inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect
it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted
a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv
direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched
to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's
better than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad,
Corse it is.
Post by keithr0
the DHCP server is completely broken.
The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given
that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem.
Post by keithr0
It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the
internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was
traced to the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was
required. That was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but
then if something went offline it got a completely different IP
address when it cam back on very annoying particularly with things
like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I have monitoring
things like solar power output and solar hot water temperature. The
solution, give everything a static address it is trivial to do and
takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd
like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like
the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates.
I've never had to reset mine,
They have in fact supplied a number of quite different modems,
the netcomm NF7, NF12, the Haewai etc.
Post by felix
and I checked the wifi speed last night. it was 22 mbps, so that's
very good considering I'm on the 25mbps plan.
But useless on the 100/40 plan.
Post by felix
the modem is Netcomm NF12. maybe TPG also use other other brands?
They do indeed and other models of that brand too.
Post by felix
I'm wondering now if I've done the right thing changing to MR
especially since I've signed up for 12 months :(
You've got a 100/40 service for less than you were paying for
25/5, get a much better modem than that steaming turd, for $1,
get MUCH better support than anything TPG supplies etc etc etc.
yeah, but if I get the slowdowns you've talked about, which I don't get
with TPG, I won't be happy!
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
keithr0
2017-04-04 06:56:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad,
Corse it is.
Post by keithr0
the DHCP server is completely broken.
The fix is to require them to supply a modem that works properly given
that its not the only problem with that steaming turd of a modem.
Post by keithr0
It takes ages to assign an IP address, the first symptom was the
internet going missing for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced
to the lease running out and a new (or the same) address was required.
That was fixed by making leases of infinite duration, but then if
something went offline it got a completely different IP address when
it cam back on very annoying particularly with things like printers
and a bunch of IOT sensors that I have monitoring things like solar
power output and solar hot water temperature. The solution, give
everything a static address it is trivial to do and takes the crap
DHCP server out of the picture.
But does nothing about the other problems with that steaming turd
like needing to be reset weekly and not doing wifi at anything like
the rate that the service is operating at with the higher rates.
Since I have a 25/5 connection not doing WiFi at the higher rate is
irrelevant. I have the Fetch TV box running over a Wifi connection and
HD movies from Stan stream perfectly. If I ever upgrade to a 4K or above
TV then I may need to do something about it, but I'll cross that bridge
when I come to it.
F Murtz
2017-04-03 23:22:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to
assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing
for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out
and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making
leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a
completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is
trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
keithr0
2017-04-04 07:09:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-

broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo

I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus
landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not
of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly
data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to
change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline
for weeks.

If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night
then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the
wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any
data at all.
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to
assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing
for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out
and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making
leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a
completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is
trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
F Murtz
2017-04-04 08:57:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?

Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area
But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if
you want)
Post by keithr0
I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus
landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not
of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly
data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to
change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline
for weeks.
If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night
then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the
wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any
data at all.
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to
assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing
for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out
and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making
leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a
completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is
trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
keithr0
2017-04-05 04:07:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv
direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
25/5 which, as I have said in this thread, suits my needs. Since, in
this house, there is usually only one high bandwidth task running at a
time, it is doubtful that we would see any difference going to 100/40.
Post by F Murtz
Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area
But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if
you want)
Post by keithr0
I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus
landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not
of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly
data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to
change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline
for weeks.
If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night
then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the
wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any
data at all.
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to
assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing
for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out
and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making
leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a
completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is
trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
F Murtz
2017-04-05 05:11:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to
inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect
it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv
direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
25/5 which, as I have said in this thread, suits my needs. Since, in
this house, there is usually only one high bandwidth task running at a
time, it is doubtful that we would see any difference going to 100/40.
As I said why not have faster if it costs no more?
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area
But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if
you want)
Post by keithr0
I am paying $69.99/mo for 250gigs of data plus all calls to aus
landlines and 100 mins of international calls. The faster speed is not
of any use to me at present, I have never used all 250gigs of monthly
data, and I'd lose the free overseas calls. Its not worth the effort to
change contracts at the moment not even to mention losing the landline
for weeks.
If I had a couple of teenagers in the house streaming stuff all night
then a faster connection and unlimited data might be worthwhile, but the
wife just does e-mail and browses the web and the dog uses hardly any
data at all.
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Locking up at random intervals is (about once a week requiring a power
cycle) and the DHCP server is complete rubbish,
Yep, that's completely fucked too.
Post by keithr0
everything in our house is set on static addresses.
Barking mad.
Not barking mad, the DHCP server is completely broken. It takes ages to
assign an IP address, the first symptom was the internet going missing
for 30 seconds or so at times, that was traced to the lease running out
and a new (or the same) address was required. That was fixed by making
leases of infinite duration, but then if something went offline it got a
completely different IP address when it cam back on very annoying
particularly with things like printers and a bunch of IOT sensors that I
have monitoring things like solar power output and solar hot water
temperature. The solution, give everything a static address it is
trivial to do and takes the crap DHCP server out of the picture.
keithr0
2017-04-05 11:10:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this
site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to
inform
that this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect
it's a
router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious
stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch,
swapping out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a
link
to ?
I didn't see any answer there. I can connect the tv
direct to
the modem, bypassing the switch, and the problem is
still
present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
just turned the tv on now and it's saying 'no internet
connection' (wired) but it is connected. so I switched to
wifi
but I'm only getting 10mbps on wifi :(
That’s because of the steaming turd of a modem that TPG
supplys.
Paul Edwards had exactly the same problem, that steaming
turd of a modem that TPG supply couldn’t come even close
to delivering the 100/40 service he was paying for. So he
originally switched to a 12/1 service instead.
He has just recently switched to myrepublic and the modem
they supply for $1 does deliver the full 100/40 his is
paying
even less than he was paying for the TPG 12/1 service.
Post by felix
I think I'll change to myrepublic. hopefully it's better
than
TPG.
The modem certainly is.
BUT some are seeing the thruput sag down to 5MB in the peak
time in the evening.
so it's just half as good as TPG on wifi
Nope, its vastly better than TPG on wifi except
for some during peak times. Paul doesn’t see
any slowdown at all so its vastly better for him.
TPG also sees congestion in peak times and has a
'support' operation that doesn’t have a fucking clue.
Expect weeks of delay getting your phone number
ported from TPG, they are notorious for that.
yeah, MR said 6 weeks
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
and only a quarter as good on ethernet
God knows where you are getting that shit from.
5mbps vs 20mbps with TPG
You don’t get 5mbps with MR
you said so in another post
I never ever said that everyone who uses MR gets that, fuckwit.
but the fact that it has means that it could
Just as true of TPG because that is due to congestion.
And with TPG its absolutely certain that the modem they
supply is a steaming turd that can't do anything like the
100/40 you are getting with MR if you are FTTP and not
FTTN.
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
25/5 which, as I have said in this thread, suits my needs. Since, in
this house, there is usually only one high bandwidth task running at a
time, it is doubtful that we would see any difference going to 100/40.
As I said why not have faster if it costs no more?
As I have said, the extra bandwidth would be of little or no advantage
to me, I'd have to go through the hassle of changing ISPs, I'd either
have to change my phone number or do without a phone for a significant
period of time and lose my 100 minutes of O/S calls per month.

Not worth the effort (at least at present).
felix
2017-04-05 09:19:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area
But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if
you want)
I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
keithr0
2017-04-05 11:06:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area
But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if
you want)
I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls
That probably works if you are on your own. With more than one person
living together, its much more convenient to have a landline (and
usually cheaper too)
Rod Speed
2017-04-05 17:57:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by keithr0
Post by felix
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area
But phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if
you want)
I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls
That probably works if you are on your own. With more than one person
living together, its much more convenient to have a landline
Dunno, most incoming calls are to a specific person and so calling their
mobile saves farting around with the person who answered the phone
not being the one the caller wanted to speak to quite a bit of the time.
Post by keithr0
(and usually cheaper too)
Depends on whether you need the mobiles for when out of the house, most do.

In that case the landline line rent is an extra.

One of my mates finds that his kid will only answer the
landline for some reason, wont answer the mobiles. He's
just turned 3.
Rod Speed
2017-04-05 17:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by F Murtz
Post by keithr0
Post by Rod Speed
Post by keithr0
The TPG FTTN modem is crap, but on a 25/5 connection, speed test gives
21.4/4.3 over wifi so throughput is not a problem.
It is when you have a 100/40 FTTP service and that
steaming turd cant do anything even remotely like
that over wifi and you only use wifi.
I don't have a 100/40 connection and like most people, don't need one.
But why not when it is cheaper than all other suppliers.
Lets see:-
broadband service $59.99/mo unlimited data
home phone $10/mo to all aus landlines
total $69.99/mo
But what speed?
Ours is $59.00 Unlimited with the fastest speed available in the area But
phone is pay as you go (you can also pay $10.00 extra for phone if you
want)
I find I don't need a home phone these days. use my mobile for all calls
Yeah, some I know have cancelled their landline service and just have
mobiles.

Main downside with that approach is that if you don’t have unlimited calls
and texts within the country, its expensive to call operations that can
leave
you on hold for half an hour or an hour etc. Tho there are unlimited call
and
text plans which cost less than the landline line rent now.

I also know some who have to have a landline for their adsl service
who don’t have a phone plugged into it to avoid spam calls too.
Rod Speed
2017-03-31 06:22:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there.
Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more
accurately something viable between the ears.
Post by felix
I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the
problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
It isnt.
felix
2017-03-31 11:11:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there.
Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more
accurately something viable between the ears.
so enlighten me then. what is it that stops the connection message
appearing, and the loss of connection even tho the cable is connected?
in your own words will be fine. (there may have been a solution there,
but not one that I understood or could implement)
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and
the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
It isnt.
yeah, thanks, that's a big help
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-03-31 18:06:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there.
Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more
accurately something viable between the ears.
so enlighten me then.
No point trying if you couldn’t understand
what was suggested in that thread.
Post by felix
what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss of
connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will be
fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I understood
Yes, you are that thick.
Post by felix
or could implement)
Even sillier than you usually manage.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and the
problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
It isnt.
yeah, thanks, that's a big help
You're clearly beyond help and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as
always.
felix
2017-03-31 23:49:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there.
Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more
accurately something viable between the ears.
so enlighten me then.
No point trying if you couldn’t understand
what was suggested in that thread.
Post by felix
what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss
of connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will
be fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I
understood
Yes, you are that thick.
Post by felix
or could implement)
Even sillier than you usually manage.
I think you just don't know the solution and are just making excuses
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and
the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
It isnt.
yeah, thanks, that's a big help
You're clearly beyond help
not really. no one can do what they don't know how to do
Post by Rod Speed
and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always.
yeah I did.. connected the modem direct to the tv and bypassed the
switch. swapped out cables to eliminate the possibility of a faulty
cable. it even plain to see above in this post.
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Rod Speed
2017-04-01 02:09:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out
cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there.
Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more
accurately something viable between the ears.
so enlighten me then.
No point trying if you couldn’t understand
what was suggested in that thread.
Post by felix
what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the loss of
connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own words will be
fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not one that I understood
Yes, you are that thick.
Post by felix
or could implement)
Even sillier than you usually manage.
I think you just don't know the solution and are just making excuses
You always run that line when you are told to go and fuck yourself, again.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch, and
the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem issue.
It isnt.
yeah, thanks, that's a big help
You're clearly beyond help
not really.
Yes, really.
Post by felix
no one can do what they don't know how to do
Even you should be able to read that thread and try
the various alternatives and see if it fixes the problem.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always.
yeah I did.. connected the modem direct to the tv and bypassed the switch.
swapped out cables to eliminate the possibility of a faulty cable. it even
plain to see above in this post.
If that is all you tried, you clearly are beyond any help.
felix
2017-04-01 04:13:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that
this problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff..
Yes you should have.
Post by felix
direct connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping
out cables, etc.,
But did you try what worked in that thread you posted a link to ?
I didn't see any answer there.
Then you need new glasses, BAD. Or more
accurately something viable between the ears.
so enlighten me then.
No point trying if you couldn’t understand
what was suggested in that thread.
Post by felix
what is it that stops the connection message appearing, and the
loss of connection even tho the cable is connected? in your own
words will be fine. (there may have been a solution there, but not
one that I understood
Yes, you are that thick.
Post by felix
or could implement)
Even sillier than you usually manage.
I think you just don't know the solution and are just making excuses
You always run that line when you are told to go and fuck yourself, again.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
Post by felix
I can connect the tv direct to the modem, bypassing the switch,
and the problem is still present. that's why I think it's a modem
issue.
It isnt.
yeah, thanks, that's a big help
You're clearly beyond help
not really.
Yes, really.
Post by felix
no one can do what they don't know how to do
Even you should be able to read that thread and try
the various alternatives and see if it fixes the problem.
Post by felix
Post by Rod Speed
and refuse to spell out what you have tried, as always.
yeah I did.. connected the modem direct to the tv and bypassed the
switch. swapped out cables to eliminate the possibility of a faulty
cable. it even plain to see above in this post.
If that is all you tried, you clearly are beyond any help.
not at all. you just either don't know the answer, or don't want to help
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Clocky
2017-03-30 23:46:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
Probably typical Lucky Goldstar but...

Did you try this from Baxter?

"This is fixed by ensuring your wifi network name is no longer than 8
characters (letters and numbers ONLY)

Eg:

BaxWiFi

And this is the killer trick, your TVs 'Name' as inputted in the
settings menu by the factory must also be only 8 letters/numbers long
and MUST NOT contain symbols, or spaces.

Eg:

Was called this: 55LN5710-TE

Changed to this: 55LN5710

Now its Perfect.

Bulletproof now for 3 days... tested on two modems.. Billion 7800NL and
NetGear D6300... On both modems before changes to 8 character names..
constant drop outs and failures.

After name change, bulletproof and faultless. :)"
felix
2017-03-31 04:27:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clocky
Post by felix
I have this same problem. just googled and got this site.
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/1958013
currently researching the issue. posting this to inform that this
problem exists with LG tv's. I suspect it's a router issue ??
I guess I should mention that I have tried the obvious stuff.. direct
connection to the modem to bypass the switch, swapping out cables, etc.,
Probably typical Lucky Goldstar but...
Did you try this from Baxter?
"This is fixed by ensuring your wifi network name is no longer than 8
characters (letters and numbers ONLY)
BaxWiFi
And this is the killer trick, your TVs 'Name' as inputted in the
settings menu by the factory must also be only 8 letters/numbers long
and MUST NOT contain symbols, or spaces.
Was called this: 55LN5710-TE
Changed to this: 55LN5710
Now its Perfect.
Bulletproof now for 3 days... tested on two modems.. Billion 7800NL
and NetGear D6300... On both modems before changes to 8 character
names.. constant drop outs and failures.
After name change, bulletproof and faultless. :)"
thanks, but no prob with wifi connection. the issue is LAN connection
dropping out and messages constantly appearing on screen. here's another
link that describes the problem

http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/threads/lg-lan-connection.105960/

similar..

https://crowdsupport.telstra.com.au/t5/Home-Broadband/LG-Smart-TV-internet-connection-cable/td-p/149010

google..

https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=lg+tv+message+cable+connected+disconnected&*
--
"Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide"
http://thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.barenakedislam.com/
http://www.siotw.org
Loading...